h/t Shakespeare's Sister for the image. Check out the full story from The House Blend.
|
|||||
Tuesday, July 4
by
Sue
on Tue 04 Jul 2006 06:52 AM EDT
Sunday, July 2
by
Sue
on Sun 02 Jul 2006 09:15 AM EDT
A press release from the Center for Lesbian and Gay Civil Rights indicates that the Pennsylvania General Assembly has recessed for the summer without passing the anti-gay marriage amendment. Differing versions of the legislation passed in each chamber -- the House including civil unions in the ban, the Senate excluding them. Because they could not pass concurring legislation in both chambers, the measure fails and our opponents will have to start over again from scratch if they want to revisit the issue. From The Center for Lesbian and Gay Civil Rights ...
According to Marriage Equality USA, 17 states have amendment their constitution to ban gay marriage (AK, AR, GA, KY, LA, MI, MO, MS, MT, NB, ND, NV, OH, OK, OR, TX, UT ). Five more states have the issue on the ballot for this year (AL, AZ, CA, TN, WI). On the bright side, Massachusetts has legalized marriage, Connecticut and Vermont have civil unions and California, Hawaii, New Jersey and Maine offer some sort of domestic partnerships. So what's next for the PA issue? It could be reintroduced at a later date which would mean it might be on the ballot for 2010. The thing to do now is to pay attention to what your state rep and senator are doing. Stay connected and continue to make them aware of the fact that they have progressive constituents who do not support bigotry and hatred. Watch their votes on immigration which will be the next big target of repressed Republican wrath. And get involved --- take a few extra steps to support candidates who actually reflect your values, not just those who aren't so bad. Avoiding a vote is not at all the same thing as promoting and respecting diverse families. Don't let them spin you --- there is a world of difference between Rep. Dan Frankel who stood up to bigotry and Senator Jay Costa who stood behind a political maneuver. I'd rather choke on my own vomit than thank someone for not being too much of a bigot. This little article about Rep Tony DeLuca is a classic example of the slippery slope Western PA Democrats seem to be heading down. And I'm sure our troll will post more anonymous little hissy slaps at me for failing to blindly adhere to the guidance and reasoning of self-styled gay leaders who have our best interests at heart ....wouldn't want the lesbians, bis and trannies to start thinking on their own now would we? Saturday, July 1
by
Sue
on Sat 01 Jul 2006 08:10 AM EDT
Penn Hill State Representative Tony DeLuca seems to be slowly peeling away the thin veneer of Democrat in which he's been encased for the past umpteen years. In addition to having voted in favor of the legislation to protect marriage from homosexuals, DeLuca is now moving deeper into Rick Santorum territory by persecuting employers for hiring immigrants. The legal kind (PG). DeLuca is upset with the Fox Chapel Golf Club for hiring six men who immigrated from Mexico to tend their grounds. Its all legal with taxes being paid and everything. DeLuca has his second-generation knickers in a wad because those jobs should go to college students.
In a letter released through his office, DeLuca also chides the Golf Club for providing housing. Note the phrase "supposedly legal"
The Golf Club contends that it did advertise the job and received exactly zero applications. What's a haven for rich mighty whites supposed to do when the not so mighty whites refuse to do manual labor? Adding to the bigotry, Thoms Smith, Mayor of Blawnox, contends that it is a matter of public safety that he see verification that the immigrants are legal. DeLuca apparently likes that approach and will introduce legislation making it mandatory that employers provide the information so the good townspeople can rest easy at night. Do you think this will include European immigrants or just those who aren't white? Declare cheesesteaks the official Blawnox sandwich and be done with it! How are these people Democrats? Could someone explain that to me? |
|||||
|