So much work still to do ...
|
|||||
Guess which City Councilor Did Not Opt to be in the 2010 Pride Guide
Comments
Re: Guess which City Councilor Did Not Opt to be in the 2010 Pride Guide
Although I'm disappointed, I think you'll find his instances of siding-with-LGTQ crowd as interesting as you'll find his instances of declining-to-side-with-the-LGBTQ crowd. And you'll find I don't defend him in every instance -- I would just hate if he got put up there with the Focus on the Family and the other villains.
Something to note, though. Good blogging. Re: Re: Guess which City Councilor Did Not Opt to be in the 2010 Pride Guide
by
Sue
on Tue 01 Jun 2010 10:40 PM EDT | Profile | Permanent Link
Oh, yes. He votes well on certain issues. It is the visibility that causes the problems, not the votes.
Reverend Burgess is not a villain, just evidence that we have work to do and how important it is not to take Pgh politics for granted. Re: Re: Re: Guess which City Councilor Did Not Opt to be in the 2010 Pride Guide
by
steelcitydyke
on Fri 04 Jun 2010 03:23 PM EDT | Profile | Permanent Link
Burgess voted against the domestic partnership registry.... just sayin
Re: Re: Re: Re: Guess which City Councilor Did Not Opt to be in the 2010 Pride Guide
by
Sue
on Sat 05 Jun 2010 10:05 AM EDT | Profile | Permanent Link
I'm not a big fan of the registry anyway. Ledcat hasn't had any word of it and she's a City employee paying for dp bennies. Two years? I think the homophobic City culture is a lot bigger than one Council member and there is a lot of work to be done. Yes, a perfect picture iin the Pride Guide would have been nice but might blind us to the deep issues.
|
|||||
|