Pittsburgh's LGBTQ Blog ... out'n proud in the Burghosphere.

Bookmark and Share
Loading
Year Archive
View Article  Do the Penguins have a gay agenda?

I have absolutely no thoughts on the retirement of Mario Lemieux.  Except for this weird recurring dream where I save his dog from a car accident and he gives me a really cheap tee-shirt in gratitude.  Whatever. 

This is the closest thing I've got on the penguin gay agenda

Wendell and Cass, two gay penguins at the New York Aquarium.

 

View Article  State Rep. Dan Frankel - A Homo's Best Friend

Dan B. Frankel
					 (Democrat)

Pennsylvania State Representative Dan Frankel (D- Allegheny) released a statement on the proposed state constitutional amendment.  Frankel is a long time LGBT ally and, unlike several of his colleagues, recognizes that there are greater threats to Pennsylvania's families than homosexuals.  Things like the economy, property tax reform, education, healthy care and so forth.

You tell 'em Dan. 

Rep. Frankel Blasts Constitutional Amendment - 1/24/2006

N E W S R E L E A S E
State Rep. Dan B. Frankel
D-Allegheny
www.pahouse.com/frankel

MEDIA CONTACT: Ben Turner
House Democratic Communications Office
Phone: 717-787-7895
Fax: 717-772-9930
Email: bturner@pahouse.net

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Frankel blasts constitutional amendment
Says it would harm unmarried straight couples, including seniors

HARRISBURG, Jan. 24 - State Rep. Dan Frankel, D-Allegheny, said a state
constitutional amendment being introduced today would harm same-sex
families and unmarried opposite-sex couples, including many senior
citizens. Sponsors of the amendment say it would prevent Pennsylvania
judges from authorizing same-sex marriage.

"The sponsors of the so-called 'marriage protection' amendment are using
gay-baiting, which is bad enough, to hide a wider agenda. State law has
banned legal recognition of same-sex marriage for the past 10 years.
It's ironic that a group of mostly Republican legislators is telling
everyone not to trust Republican judges, including the
Republican-majority state Supreme Court," Frankel said.

The sweeping language of the amendment would ban civil unions and other
legal recognition of unmarried relationships. Frankel said it could
threaten the rights of adoptive parents, as well as health coverage,
medical decision-making rights and inheritance rights. The amendment
also could harm senior citizens who do not marry their partners to avoid
losing Social Security or pension benefits.

"In Ohio, a similar amendment has caused domestic violence cases with
unmarried straight victims to be thrown out - pursuing those cases was
found to be 'legal recognition' of the unmarried relationship. In
Michigan, anti-gay activists are suing to take away health coverage,
even though before the amendment passed, they said those benefits
wouldn't be threatened.

"The supporters of this amendment need to read the state Supreme Court's
2004 ruling in the Devlin case about Philadelphia's domestic-partner
registry. The court clearly stated the partnership registry was only
permitted because it is something less than and distinct from civil
marriage.

"This amendment should be put aside so we can focus on bills that
actually help people, like property tax reform, raising the minimum wage
after nine years, improving our economy and our schools and making
affordable health care available to everyone.

"The federal and state constitutions should not be used to take rights
away from law-abiding citizens. Our national and state constitutions are
the bulwarks that protect the rights of all citizens."

Frankel is the lead sponsor of legislation (H.B. 1417
) that
would allow unmarried partners in same-sex or opposite-sex relationships
to make critical health decisions for one another and to visit each
other in the hospital. A 2003 poll
found 88
percent support in Pennsylvania for such legislation, and last week,
Maryland's Republican governor announced his support for a similar bill.

 

 

View Article  Homophobes in High School - Teachers?

A group of teachers in San Leandro High School (California) are refusing to display posters promoting gay diversity. 


The posters were designed by the school's  Gay-Straight Alliance and show a rainbow flag and bear the words "This is a safe place to be who you are." 


The "educators" are hiding behind the illusion that the posters violate their religious beliefs.  Since when is making school safe for children in conflict with any religion?  Did I miss the encyclical declaring bullying a sanctified activity? 

Here's a breath of fresh air from the school district


"This is not about religion, sex or a belief system,'' district Superintendent Christine Lim told the San Francisco Chronicle.

"This is about educators making sure our schools are safe for our children, regardless of their sexual orientation," said Lim, who sponsored the poster measure. 


I can only imagine what these edu-bigots have overlooked in the way of gay bullying in their classrooms.  Or gender bullying.  Only a truly ignorant rube would object to creating safe spaces for all kids in which to learn. 

How long til the AFA and the Thomas More Center weigh in on this?

 

<tick tick tick>

 

 

View Article  Pittsburgh's Gay Agenda

Tonight is the monthly meeting to plan and carry out Pittsburgh's Gay Agenda.  :-)

Voices for a New Tomorrow:  a collaboration of LGBT organizations and individuals

All are welcome!

4th Wednesdays monthly

6 pm - 8 pm

FSWP East Liberty Offices

Village of Eastside

6401 Penn Avenue, 2nd Floor

Pittsburgh, PA 15206

voices @ glccpgh.org

************************

Sue

Follow PghLesbian24 on Twitter

The Correspondents